Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1169/2024

Case between Jain M S vs Sajeev A Joy regarding temporary injunction against forcible eviction

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-07-21
Duration
approximately-3 years 8 months 11 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jain M S, a plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction to prevent defendant Sajeev A Joy from forcibly evicting him and his subtenants from leased properties. The case involves disputes over lease agreements and alleged non-payment of rent.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition for a temporary injunction, ruling that the plaintiff did not establish a prima facie case. The defendant's claims regarding non-payment of rent were found credible.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for a temporary injunction, ruling that the plaintiff did not establish a prima facie case. The defendant's claims regarding non-payment of rent were found credible.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience favored the defendant.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience favored the defendant.
Supporting Evidence
The court is not satisfied that there exists a prima facie case in favour of petitioner. Also, the irreparable injury will be caused to respondent as the respondent being the landlord will be at peril if the agreed rent is not paid without fail by the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Petition is dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, parties are directed to bear their respective costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jain M S
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajeev A Joy
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of rent agreement dated 10.11.2021
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K Mahadevan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Denny Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Joji George Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought a temporary injunction against forcible eviction from the plaint schedule room.
Evidence:
Accordingly, above points are found against the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lease Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the lease deed upon which the plaintiff's claim for temporary injunction is based, outlining the agreement terms for the apartment units.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jain M S vs Sajeev A Joy regarding temporary injunction against forcible eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Jain M S vs Sajeev A Joy regarding temporary injunction against forcible eviction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/10/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won