Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 215/2020

Case between Jacob P George vs Moncy T Maliakal et al regarding a civil suit.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-07-30
Duration
Case Closed
Wed, 07/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jacob P George is the plaintiff in this case against Moncy T Maliakal and T V Chandy regarding a civil matter. A compromise agreement was filed by both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The case was resolved through a compromise agreement accepted by the court. The terms of the agreement are lawful and form part of the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Suit is decreed in terms of Compromise Agreement.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was resolved through a compromise agreement accepted by the court. The terms of the agreement are lawful and form part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of compromise were lawful and accepted by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of compromise were lawful and accepted by the court.
Supporting Evidence
The terms of compromise were lawful and accepted by the court.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence accepted. Suit is decreed in terms of Compromise Agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jacob P George
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Moncy T Maliakal
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T V Chandy @ Reji
Party Age
50
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise Agreement
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Tharakan and George Associates
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sunny George Chathukulam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Satheesh P S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of Compromise Agreement.
Evidence:
Hence accepted. Suit is decreed in terms of Compromise Agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Compromise agreement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court accepted the Compromise Agreement which formed part of the decree.
Reference:
IA 9/25

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jacob P George vs Moncy T Maliakal et al regarding a civil suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Jacob P George vs Moncy T Maliakal et al regarding a civil suit.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Nattakom Service Co-Operative Bank et al vs Roy V.J. et al regarding Decree
Munsiff Court/Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between N.M.Sivarajan vs George Varghese @ Georgekutty, Anil Varghese, Aliyamma regarding compromise petition.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between N.A.George et al vs T.C. Ipe et al regarding declaration and injunction
Principal Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Abraham Philipose et al vs John Mathyas et al regarding injunction and fixation of boundary
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Surendran. T.U vs State of Kerala et al regarding default dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won