Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1363/2019

Case between J. K Enterprises vs Valsalan K.P regarding realization of amount on promissory note

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-10-26
Duration
approximately-5 years 2 months
Case Closed
Sat, 10/26/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, J. K Enterprises, claims the defendant, Valsalan K.P, failed to repay an amount borrowed on a promissory note. The case involves allegations of willful default and disputes over interest rates and the validity of the money lending transaction.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit, concluding that the plaintiff failed to establish the cause of action and proper documentation regarding the money lending claim.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit, concluding that the plaintiff failed to establish the cause of action and proper documentation regarding the money lending claim.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff did not properly establish the cause of action and failed to provide necessary evidence and documentation for the claim.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff did not properly establish the cause of action and failed to provide necessary evidence and documentation for the claim.
Supporting Evidence
I am of the opinion, in consideration of the totality of the circumstances mentioned above and the discussions made above, that the issues are to be answered as against the plaintiff and are answered so.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed. Parties are directed to suffer their respective costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
J. K Enterprises
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Valsalan K.P
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Promissory Note, Lawyer Notice, Postal Receipt, Ledger Book of J.K Enterprises, Day Book of J.K Enterprises, Money Lending Licence
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vijayan Mannaly
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T. A Niyas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.A Alexander
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover a total amount of ₹59,300/-.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document evidences the amount borrowed by the defendant from the plaintiff and the terms of repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the plaintiff had made a demand for repayment of the borrowed amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the fact that a notice was sent to the defendant regarding the repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Ledger Book of J.K Enterprises
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was subject to proof to validate the transactions related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Page of Ledger Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was subject to proof to validate a specific transaction in the ledger.
Reference:
Ext.A4(a)
Document Type: Page of Ledger Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was subject to proof to validate a specific transaction in the ledger.
Reference:
Ext.A4(b)
Document Type: Day Book of J.K Enterprises
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was subject to proof to demonstrate the business transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Page of Day Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was subject to proof to validate a specific transaction in the day book.
Reference:
Ext.A5(a)
Document Type: Money Lending Licence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is evidence of the plaintiff's authorization to conduct money lending business.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between J. K Enterprises vs Valsalan K.P regarding realization of amount on promissory note
Case Code Year
Case between J. K Enterprises vs Valsalan K.P regarding realization of amount on promissory note

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 08/25/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 10/26/2024 - 12:00
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Antony Chiriyankandath vs Sri. Mathew C.T. regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera N B vs Vincy E J et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s Crystal Traders regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won