Case Summary
Multiple plaintiffs residing in Edayur amsom, Athipatta desom, PO.Edayur filed a suit against defendants also residing in the same area seeking a permanent injunction. The court delivered the judgment exparte due to defendants' absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Injunction refused
Case Type
Civil Suit - Permanent Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for permanent injunction was dismissed due to the absence of plaintiffs and their representatives.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Why Defendant Won:
Absent plaintiffs and no representation.
Absent plaintiffs and no representation.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Illikkal Kumaran
- Party Age
- 77
- Relation
- S/o. Illikkal Velayudhan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muttikkal Hydras Haji
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o. Moideenkutty Musliar
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Suit for permanent injunction dismissed due to absence of plaintiffs
Evidence:
IA 274/2018 dismissed. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of plaintiff is called, absent. No representation.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Permanent injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Illikkal Kumaran et al vs Muttikkal Hydras Haji et al regarding permanent injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Illikkal Kumaran et al vs Muttikkal Hydras Haji et al regarding permanent injunction