Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 916/2024

Case between IDBI Bank Ltd vs Kudumbasree Div 9 NHG et al regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-12-11
Duration
approximately-2 years 10 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves IDBI Bank Ltd seeking repayment from Kudumbasree Div 9 NHG and its members for a defaulted loan. The court found the defendants failed to appear, leading to an ex-parte decision in favor of the bank.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of IDBI Bank Ltd, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with interest and costs from the defendants. The court found the claims of the plaintiff to be uncontroverted.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.3,96,571.93/- along with interest at specified rates
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of IDBI Bank Ltd, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with interest and costs from the defendants. The court found the claims of the plaintiff to be uncontroverted.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully established the case with supporting evidence and testimonies.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff successfully established the case with supporting evidence and testimonies.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A6 series established the case as pleaded by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows. Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.3,96,571.93/- from the defendants and from their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
IDBI Bank Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kudumbasree Div 9 NHG 30 ANGEL
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kappithan Parambil Santhyav Salomi
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Varna.P.P.
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Heizal Baby
Party Age
21
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunitha
Party Age
32
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original loan agreement, Original sanction letter, Original interse agreement, Account statement along with certification from 01.01.2022 to 24.05.2024, Copy of loan recall notice, Original postal receipts (11 Nos.)
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paulochan Antony P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Girish R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Neethu T.R.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Christeena
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rachel Shaji
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs.3,96,571.93/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows. Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.3,96,571.93/- from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest at 11% per annum from the date of suit till date of decree.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 11% per annum for Rs.3,96,571.93/- from the date of suit till date decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest at 6% per annum from date of decree till date of realization.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.3,96,571.93/- from date of decree till date of realization.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the terms of the loan provided by the plaintiff to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the approval of the loan by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Inter-Se agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document binds all members of the Joint Liability Group to the loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Account statement along with certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides the financial details related to the loan account during the specified period.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of loan recall notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the formal demand for repayment issued to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Original postal receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents serve as evidence of service of the loan recall notice.
Reference:
Ext.A6 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between IDBI Bank Ltd vs Kudumbasree Div 9 NHG et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between IDBI Bank Ltd vs Kudumbasree Div 9 NHG et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/31/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won