Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 701/2022

Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs KUDUMBASREE DIV 5 NHG et al regarding realisation of money

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-12-21
Duration
approximately-2 years 10 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

IDBI Bank Limited has filed a suit against KUDUMBASREE DIV 5 NHG and other defendants for the recovery of a loan amount that the defendants failed to repay. The court found the defendants liable for the payment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendants (except for the second and third) are liable to pay the plaintiff an amount of ₹4,80,781.18 along with interest. If they fail to pay, the plaintiff can recover this amount from the defendants or their assets.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Payment of ₹4,80,781.18 with interest at 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the defendants (except for the second and third) are liable to pay the plaintiff an amount of ₹4,80,781.18 along with interest. If they fail to pay, the plaintiff can recover this amount from the defendants or their assets.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved due to uncontested evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved due to uncontested evidence.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of the PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1. I am of the opinion that the defendants owe a total amount of 4,80,781.18/- to the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendants (except the second and third defendants) are directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 4,80,781.18/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendants (except the second and third defendants) or their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sri. Wilson Kuruvilla Mundupuzhakal
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
KUDUMBASREE DIV 5 NHG
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt. Najuma.B
Party Age
39
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt. Shaharban
Party Age
30
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt. Jesmi K.S
Party Age
20
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt. Hayarunisa
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Articles of Loan Agreement, Letter of Intent, Inter-se Agreement, Computer printout of Statement of Account for the period from 20.02.2018 to 31.12.2020
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paulochan Antony P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Padmapriya P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants (except the second and third defendants) are directed to pay the plaintiff an amount of 4,80,781.18/- with interest.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the same from the available defendants, with interest from the date of suit.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendants (except the second and third defendants).
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendants (except the second and third defendants).

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Articles of Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as evidence to support the plaintiff's claim regarding the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Letter of intent
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as evidence to support the plaintiff's claim regarding the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Inter-se Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as evidence to support the plaintiff's claim regarding the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Computer printout of Statement of Account for the period from 20.02.2018 to 31.12.2020
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provided the financial details and outstanding amount owed by defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs KUDUMBASREE DIV 5 NHG et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs KUDUMBASREE DIV 5 NHG et al regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 12/11/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won