Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 548 of 2022

Case between ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Sooraj A.R, Saju Raj A.R regarding realisation of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Rejani Thankappan
Order Date
2024-03-11
Duration
approximately-4 years 8 months
Case Closed
Mon, 03/11/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

ICICI Bank Ltd. filed a suit against Sooraj A.R and Saju Raj A.R for recovery of an outstanding loan amount. The defendants defaulted on their repayments, leading the plaintiff to seek legal redress.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount from the defendants. The plaintiff is entitled to recover interest and costs as well.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.5,68,162/- together with interest and costs from the defendants.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount from the defendants. The plaintiff is entitled to recover interest and costs as well.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unrebated evidence of the plaintiff established the defendants' liability to repay the loan.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unrebated evidence of the plaintiff established the defendants' liability to repay the loan.
Supporting Evidence
From the unrebutted evidence of PW1 and from Exts.A1 to A5 documents the plaint averments stands proved.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: A) The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.5,68,162/- together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree, and thereafter @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till entire realization in full from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. Jijin A.M
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sooraj A.R
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saju Raj A.R
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of power of attorney, Preliminary credit facility application form, Unattested deed of hypothecation, Loan recall notice, Loan account statement
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B.S Sureshkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ashley John
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.5,68,162 together with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.5,68,162 (Rupees Five lakhs Sixty Eight thousand One hundred and Sixty Two only) together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff bank is entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff bank is also entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as part of the evidence provided by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Preliminary Credit Facility Application form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as part of the evidence provided by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Unattested deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as part of the evidence provided by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Loan recall notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as part of the evidence provided by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Loan Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as part of the evidence provided by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Sooraj A.R, Saju Raj A.R regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Sooraj A.R, Saju Raj A.R regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 07/31/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 03/11/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won