Case Summary
HDFC Bank Ltd. is the plaintiff in this case against Mr. Wiliam Baretto and others. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence without representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found the plaintiff absent without representation and dismissed the case.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff no representation. Plaintiff is continuously absent without representation and no steps is taken as ordered. Plaintiff is absent despite specific direction to appear. Dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- HDFC Bank Ltd.
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. Wiliam Baretto
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. Motif Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd.
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Altaf M.I
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.P Saji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anjana K.H
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Paul S Manguzha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anish Abraham
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between HDFC Bank Ltd. vs Mr. Wiliam Baretto et al regarding absence in court proceedings
Case Code Year
Case between HDFC Bank Ltd. vs Mr. Wiliam Baretto et al regarding absence in court proceedings