Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION 28/2024

Case between HASHIM vs KUTTANGARATH BHASKARAN et al regarding rent arrears and eviction.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM.
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-11-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Hashim, filed a rent control petition for eviction against the respondents due to non-payment of rent. The respondents claim they surrendered the premises and are contesting the eviction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The Rent Control Petition was allowed in part, directing the respondents to vacate the premises and pay costs. The respondents must hand over possession within 30 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondents from the petition schedule room.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The Rent Control Petition was allowed in part, directing the respondents to vacate the premises and pay costs. The respondents must hand over possession within 30 days.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the petitioner established his entitlement to eviction based on non-payment of rent.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the petitioner established his entitlement to eviction based on non-payment of rent.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner was able to prove that the respondents had defaulted on rent payments, establishing the landlord-tenant relationship.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, RCP is allowed in part with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
HASHIM
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
KUTTANGARATH BHASKARAN
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
THE AGRICULTURE OFFICER
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent Agreement dated 05.01.2019, Copy of Lawyer Notice dated 19.04.2024.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Ali. V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Manoj Aroor
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. C. Prasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of the respondents from the petition schedule room under section 11(2)(b) of the Act.
Evidence:
The respondents are hereby directed to put the petitioner–land lord in the vacant possession of the petition schedule room under section 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Granting of vacant possession of the shop room to the petitioner.
Evidence:
The respondents are hereby directed to put the petitioner–land lord in the vacant possession of the petition schedule room under section 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondents are directed to pay costs of the proceedings.
Evidence:
The respondents are also directed to pay the costs of the proceedings to the petitioners.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Relief under section 11(4)(v) of the Act.
Evidence:
The counsel for the petitioner has stated that they are not pressing for a relief under that provision.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the landlord-tenant relationship between the petitioner and the first respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Informing the respondents about the default in payment of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Account Opening Form
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Document showing account details related to the rent payment.
Reference:
Ext.X1
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Account statement evidencing the rent payment history.
Reference:
Ext.X2

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between HASHIM vs KUTTANGARATH BHASKARAN et al regarding rent arrears and eviction.
Case Code Year
Case between HASHIM vs KUTTANGARATH BHASKARAN et al regarding rent arrears and eviction.

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kozhikode District, Kerala.
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Shajahan vs Ajeesh regarding eviction of tenant
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between AYISU vs SHIBIN et al regarding eviction of tenants from the petition schedule shop room.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between SAYID et al vs CHIRAYIL M. ABDULLA regarding eviction from shop room
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between NEDUMPARAMBIL BESSY et al vs VALLIL JAMAL regarding lease and rent control
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. V. P. RAJAN vs 1Adv. V. T. PRADEEP KUMAR et al regarding eviction of tenant
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won