Case Summary
The petitioners, Harikumar and others, filed a petition to restore a counter claim in an earlier suit. The respondent, Lucy Lorence, remained absent despite receiving notice.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition to restore the counter claim was dismissed by the court due to the absence of representation from the counter claim plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The petition to restore the counter claim cannot be allowed as there was no representation from the counter claim plaintiff and no sufficient reason was provided for the absence.
The petition to restore the counter claim cannot be allowed as there was no representation from the counter claim plaintiff and no sufficient reason was provided for the absence.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
In the result the petition is dismissed. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Harikumar
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rema Harikumar
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sreelatha
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lucy Lorence
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- Kallada P.Kunjumon
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The petition to restore the counter claim cannot be allowed.
Evidence:
However, on 15/03/25 also, there was no representation from the side of counter claim plaintiff, but no reason has been stated.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Harikumar et al vs Lucy Lorence regarding restoration of counter claim
Case Code Year
Case between Harikumar et al vs Lucy Lorence regarding restoration of counter claim