Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No . 50/2021

Case between Hari Krishna Varma vs Sreejith N.U regarding dismissal of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-03-14
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Hari Krishna Varma and Binu Jacob against defendants Sreejith N.U and Sibin James regarding a suit that was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence. The court found that the plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and their lack of readiness to present evidence. The court noted that the plaintiff was not present on multiple occasions.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and their lack of readiness to present evidence. The court noted that the plaintiff was not present on multiple occasions.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Hari Krishna Varma
Party Age
26
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Binu Jacob
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreejith N.U
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sibin James
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. R Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.S Letha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kurian Maxie
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswin Venugopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreerekha K.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sangeetha K.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. Rajagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M. N. Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sreedas K.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's suit was dismissed due to non-appearance.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is not present or ready for evidence in listed case.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Hari Krishna Varma vs Sreejith N.U regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Hari Krishna Varma vs Sreejith N.U regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won