Case Summary
Hareesh Kumar is the decree holder who filed an execution petition against Raju, the judgment debtor. The court considered the filed memo indicating that the decree was satisfied and subsequently closed the execution petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was closed after the decree holder filed a memo stating that the decree was satisfied.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The decree holder demonstrated that the decree was satisfied.
The decree holder demonstrated that the decree was satisfied.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The decree holder demonstrated that the decree was satisfied.
The decree holder demonstrated that the decree was satisfied.
Supporting Evidence
The decree holder filed a memo indicating satisfaction of the decree.
Judgment Evidence:
Decree holder filed memo vide CF No. 7020/2025 and memo stated that decree satisfied. EP closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Hareesh Kumar
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raju
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Memo stating decree satisfied.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anub B. Mundakkal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ullas Kumar.U
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Hareesh Kumar vs Raju regarding Execution Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Hareesh Kumar vs Raju regarding Execution Petition