Case Summary
Haneefa filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against Mammu and others. The case was remanded and ultimately dismissed following a joint petition for compromise.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court recorded a lawful compromise and dismissed the suit as per the joint petition filed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Compromise is lawful. Compromised recorded.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed in view of Joint petition.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Haneefa
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mammu
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Amina
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thahir
- Party Age
- 19
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Haseena
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hamda
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Joint petition
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P.Praveen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.A.Padmakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit dismissed in view of Joint petition.
Evidence:
Suit is one for permanent prohibitory injunction. IA 1836/19 allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Haneefa vs Mammu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Haneefa vs Mammu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction