Case Summary
The plaintiff Gurunathan. S filed a suit for perceptual injunction. The case was dismissed for default as both parties were absent and no representation was made.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of both the plaintiff and the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Gurunathan. S
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- R.Jesikala
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M. Monisha
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M. Ancy
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M. Susmi
- Party Age
- 22
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Benoy Bal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Thattamala M Navas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit for perceptual injunction was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Gurunathan. S vs R.Jesikala et al regarding perceptual injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Gurunathan. S vs R.Jesikala et al regarding perceptual injunction