Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 998/2023

Case between Grenesiis Land and Leisure Pvt. Ltd vs Nandakumar et al regarding default dismissal of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-01-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Grenesiis Land and Leisure Pvt. Ltd filed a suit against Nandakumar and Valsala Devi. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff was absent and unrepresented.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was absent and unrepresented, leading to the suit being dismissed for default. This was the second time the suit was called for hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and unrepresented, leading to the suit being dismissed for default. This was the second time the suit was called for hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation warranted a dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The court determined that the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation warranted a dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent, Not represented. Suit was posted for plaintiffs evidence continuously for the 2nd time. Plaintiff absent and no representation also for the plaintiff continuously.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Grenesiis Land and Leisure Pvt. Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nandakumar
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Valsala Devi
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sushanth J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vrinda Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Prasanth V.C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Misna Saleem
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Pramod Prabhakaran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Grenesiis Land and Leisure Pvt. Ltd vs Nandakumar et al regarding default dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Grenesiis Land and Leisure Pvt. Ltd vs Nandakumar et al regarding default dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won