Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1316/2022

Case between GREENLAND TRAVELS et al vs SREENIVAS N. et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-11-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, represented by GREENLAND TRAVELS and P.J. JOHNY, were involved in a suit against multiple defendants including SREENIVAS N. The court dismissed the suit due to the continuous absence of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs, indicating they were not interested in continuing the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs, indicating they were not interested in continuing the case.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence this court is of the view that plaintiff is not interested to prosecute further with the case. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
GREENLAND TRAVELS
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.J. JOHNY
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.J. BEJOY
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SREENIVAS N.
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SULFIKER K.S.
Party Age
26
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SHIJIN LAL K.M.
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
John Mathew & Jobin John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N. Retheesh, Suma Retheesh, Shankar Retheesh & Midhunraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Hence this court is of the view that plaintiff is not interested to prosecute further with the case. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between GREENLAND TRAVELS et al vs SREENIVAS N. et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between GREENLAND TRAVELS et al vs SREENIVAS N. et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 11/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won