Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1181/2016

Case between Gracy Sunny vs Roy Fertal et al regarding restoration of suit

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-12-06
Duration
approximately-8 years 21 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Gracy Sunny filed a restoration petition to reinstate the suit after it was dismissed. The court dismissed the petition due to no representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the restoration petition due to lack of representation from the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the restoration petition due to lack of representation from the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the petition as there was no representation by the petitioner.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court dismissed the petition as there was no representation by the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

No representation. Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gracy Sunny
Party Age
70
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Roy Fertal
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bilaya Fertal
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Antony
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Philomina
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. B Pradeep
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vishnu Pradeep
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Basil Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Amrutha Vidyadharan A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Deepa T.O
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.V Prakasan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Babu Cherukara
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.A Salim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Request to restore the suit setting aside the order of dismissal.
Evidence:
No representation. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Gracy Sunny vs Roy Fertal et al regarding restoration of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Gracy Sunny vs Roy Fertal et al regarding restoration of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 11/15/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won