Case Summary
Gopi filed a suit against Chozhi seeking an injunction. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing and the defendant was present.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence. The defendant was present during the proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Gopi
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chozhi
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.Vijayaraghavan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P.Praveen.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit is one for injunction.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Gopi vs Chozhi regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Gopi vs Chozhi regarding injunction