Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 29 / 2018

Case between Gopi S/o Kuttan Ramakrishnan vs Kuriako et al regarding fixation of boundary and consequential injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Judge
Smt. Sirsha.N.A
Order Date
2024-10-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Gopi, is seeking an amendment to the plaint for the fixation of boundaries and consequential injunction. The defendants are opposing the amendment, alleging it is belated and intended to delay the trial.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the proposed amendment to the plaint for the fixation of boundaries, stating it is essential for the final adjudication of the dispute.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the proposed amendment to the plaint for the fixation of boundaries, stating it is essential for the final adjudication of the dispute.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The proposed amendment was deemed necessary for the finality of adjudication.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The proposed amendment was deemed necessary for the finality of adjudication.
Supporting Evidence
Thus the point is answered in favour of the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the I.A. is allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gopi
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kuriako
Party Age
80
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Alias S/o Kuriako
Party Age
45
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.Y.Saju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.K.Joy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The proposed amendment of the plaint for fixation of boundary was allowed.
Evidence:
In the light of the above discussions, this court finds that it is necessary to allow the proposed amendment of the plaint for finality of adjudication of the dispute between the parties.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Fixation of boundary
Case Code
Case between Gopi S/o Kuttan Ramakrishnan vs Kuriako et al regarding fixation of boundary and consequential injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Gopi S/o Kuttan Ramakrishnan vs Kuriako et al regarding fixation of boundary and consequential injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Komalvalliyamma vs Meera et al regarding partition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between P.M.Gopalakrishnan Nair et al vs Adv.P.R.Rajan et al regarding declaration of easement right of way and injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Anie Ittan W/o Ittan et al vs Kurian S/o Joseph regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The Court of the Munsiff Kolenchery
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shibi Baby W/o Baby Joseph vs George S/o Paulose regarding declaration and injunction
THE MUNSIFF AT KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shibi Baby, W/o Baby Joseph et al vs George S/o Paulose regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won