OS. No. 697/2024

Case between Gokulan et al vs Santha et al regarding cancellation of Document and partition.

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM

Judge

Smt. Ragi.S.

Order Date

2025-06-23

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs filed a suit for cancellation of a document and for a preliminary decree for partition. The plaintiffs were absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation.

Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiffs were continuously absent.

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

The court noted the plaintiffs' continuous absence and no representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed for want of prosecution.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Gokulan
Party Age: 34
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Mayadevi
Party Age: 36
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Vrichikan
Party Age: 31
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Maheswari
Party Age: 29
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Vineetha
Party Age: 27
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Santha
Party Age: 70
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Babu
Party Age: 47
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Madhu
Party Age: 37
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sindhu
Party Age: 42
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Lathika
Party Age: 40
Relation: D/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Adv.Binu Balachandran
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification