Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No.657/2013

Case between Girish Kumar et al vs Allikutty et al regarding Compromise

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-03-27
Duration
approximately-11 years 0 days
Case Closed
Thu, 03/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Girish Kumar and Jisha Girish, engaged in a legal suit against the defendants, Allikutty and Dasappan, which has been settled through a compromise agreement. The court accepted the terms of the compromise and decreed the suit accordingly.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the compromise petition filed by both parties. The suit is decreed as per the terms of the compromise.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the compromise petition filed by both parties. The suit is decreed as per the terms of the compromise.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court accepted the terms in the compromise.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court accepted the terms in the compromise.
Supporting Evidence
The terms in the compromise is accepted and is recorded.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is decreed as per the terms in the compromise.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Girish Kumar
Party Age
37
Relation
S/O
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jisha Girish
Party Age
31
Relation
W/O
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Allikutty
Party Age
58
Relation
W/O
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dasappan
Party Age
65
Relation
S/O
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise petition.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Sajan A Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Ashok
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Reshmi K.M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed as per the terms in the compromise.
Evidence:
The terms in the compromise is accepted and is recorded. Suit is decreed as per the terms in the compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document was part of the decree and pertains to the compromise terms.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document was part of the decree and pertains to the compromise terms.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Girish Kumar et al vs Allikutty et al regarding Compromise
Case Code Year
Case between Girish Kumar et al vs Allikutty et al regarding Compromise

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Wed, 03/27/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 03/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Nattakom Service Co-Operative Bank et al vs Roy V.J. et al regarding Decree
Munsiff Court/Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between N.M.Sivarajan vs George Varghese @ Georgekutty, Anil Varghese, Aliyamma regarding compromise petition.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between N.A.George et al vs T.C. Ipe et al regarding declaration and injunction
Principal Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Abraham Philipose et al vs John Mathyas et al regarding injunction and fixation of boundary
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Surendran. T.U vs State of Kerala et al regarding default dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won