Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.93/2016

Case between G.G.Jayakala vs P.S.Padmakumar et al regarding Declaration and Injunction

Court
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-03-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

G.G.Jayakala filed a suit for Declaration and Injunction against P.S.Padmakumar and Jyothilekshmi. The matter was settled through mediation, leading to a compromise between the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise reached between the parties. The court fees paid by the Plaintiff are to be refunded.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms. Court fees paid by the Plaintiff are to be refunded.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise reached between the parties. The court fees paid by the Plaintiff are to be refunded.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the said compromise.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The subject matter of this suit was settled between the parties in the mediation session and they had entered into a compromise.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
G.G.Jayakala
Party Age
43
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.S.Padmakumar
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jyothilekshmi
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.R.Jayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P.Sankara Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff's suit is decreed in its terms based on the compromise.
Evidence:
Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff's suit is decreed in its terms based on the compromise.
Evidence:
Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between G.G.Jayakala vs P.S.Padmakumar et al regarding Declaration and Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between G.G.Jayakala vs P.S.Padmakumar et al regarding Declaration and Injunction

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam District
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won