Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 683/2022

Case between George Cleetus M A vs Sheela Sojan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-10-16
Duration
approximately-3 years 29 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

George Cleetus M A is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Sheela Sojan and her husband Sojan, alleging unlawful dispossession from property. The case involves a dispute over ownership and possession rights concerning a jointly owned property after the death of the plaintiff's wife.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court partially decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from dispossessing him from the property while acknowledging the defendants' rights as co-owners.
Judgment Favored
Partial
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction from dispossessing the plaintiff from the plaint A schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court partially decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from dispossessing him from the property while acknowledging the defendants' rights as co-owners.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed partly with costs as follows: 1) The defendant and their men are restrained by permanent prohibitory injunction from dispossessing the plaintiff from plaint A schedule property forcefully.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
George Cleetus M A
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheela Sojan
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sojan
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certificate of Marriage, Certified copy of Sale deed No: 2422/1993, Original of Death Certificate of Mary, Original of official document for Covid 19 death, Tax paid receipt, Photocopy of Document in OA 1095/71
Defendants Documents
Original Gift deed No. 1039/22, Tax paid receipt issued from Mulavukad Village Office, Tax paid receipt issued from Mulavukad Village Office, Tax paid receipt issued from Mulavukad Village Office

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K G Cleetus
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paul N N
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P R Madhusoodhanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Haseena K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Seeking to restrain the defendants and their men from dispossessing the plaintiff from the plaint A schedule property.
Evidence:
The court is satisfied that the plaintiff has every right to reside therein and he cannot be dispossessed by the defendant forcefully.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Request for costs to be awarded in favor of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, court does not find any reason for not awarding costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Marriage Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the relationship between the plaintiff and the deceased wife.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the claim over the property by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the death of the plaintiff's wife, which is crucial for inheritance claims.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Official Document for Covid-19 Death
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the claim regarding the circumstances of the deceased's passing.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the plaintiff's ongoing financial responsibility for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Land Tribunal Document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes ownership and boundary details concerning the property.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Gift Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Claims that the first defendant has rightful ownership of the property in dispute.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Used to demonstrate payment of taxes related to the defendant's claim on the property.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Supports the defendant's position regarding property maintenance.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Further corroborates the defendant's claim regarding ownership and tax responsibility.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Provided findings relevant to the property conditions and possession during the court proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between George Cleetus M A vs Sheela Sojan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between George Cleetus M A vs Sheela Sojan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 09/19/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won