Case Summary
George Alexander filed a suit against Thomas P. George seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not file an affidavit.
The plaintiff was absent and did not file an affidavit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not file an affidavit.
The plaintiff was absent and did not file an affidavit.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent and did not file an affidavit.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- George Alexander
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thomas P. George
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V. Sugathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R.Geetha
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- John George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jasmine
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between George Alexander vs Thomas P. George regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between George Alexander vs Thomas P. George regarding permanent prohibitory injunction