Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Gandhi and Suprabha, filed a suit for injunction against the defendants, Vijayan, Nirmala, Nivin, and Vineetha. The suit was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the plaintiffs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiffs' continuous absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Gandhi
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suprabha
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vijayan
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nirmala
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nivin
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vineetha
- Party Age
- 22
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Panambil S.Jayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Justin Poulose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff requested an injunction.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Gandhi vs Vijayan et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Gandhi vs Vijayan et al regarding Injunction