Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 34/2024

Case between G. Balagopal Murali Kini vs Xavier regarding execution of decree

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-12-18
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

G. Balagopal Murali Kini, represented by Geetha B.M, is the decree holder seeking execution of a decree against Xavier, the judgment debtor. The court issued an order on execution methods.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the decree holder to take steps to execute the decree by means other than arrest and detention within one month.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Execution decree to be carried out by modes other than arrest
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the decree holder to take steps to execute the decree by means other than arrest and detention within one month.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Court found that alternative execution methods were appropriate and granted the decree holder the relief sought.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Court found that alternative execution methods were appropriate and granted the decree holder the relief sought.
Supporting Evidence
The court recognized the decree holder's rights and allowed execution through alternative means.

Judgment Evidence:

Take steps to execute decree by modes other than arrest and detention. EA 864/24 dismissed (vide separate Order).

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
G. Balagopal Murali Kini
Party Age
84
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Geetha B.M
Party Age
77
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Xavier
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M. V Kishore Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Take steps to execute decree by modes other than arrest and detention.
Evidence:
Take steps to execute decree by modes other than arrest and detention.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Take steps to execute decree by other modes within one month as last chance.
Evidence:
Take steps to execute decree by other modes within one month as last chance 14.02.2025.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between G. Balagopal Murali Kini vs Xavier regarding execution of decree
Case Code Year
Case between G. Balagopal Murali Kini vs Xavier regarding execution of decree

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Mahendra Kumar. C vs Suresh. V. Varghese regarding E.P No. 199/2023
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Cornation Curries Private Limited vs Happy Varghese et al regarding E.P No. 31/2020
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Shamughapuram Co-operative Bank Limited vs Sumathy Vijayan regarding execution petition
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Manager, DTDC Express Limited et al regarding decree satisfaction
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won