Case Summary
Fr.Sleeba Paul Vattavelil filed a suit against ING Vysya bank Ltd and its officials. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and inability to adduce evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found the plaintiff's request for adjournment due to being abroad as insufficient. Consequently, the suit was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide evidence despite multiple adjournments.
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide evidence despite multiple adjournments.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide evidence despite multiple adjournments.
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide evidence despite multiple adjournments.
Supporting Evidence
The suit is critically old one filed in the year 2005. The plaintiff is bound to appear and adduce evidence, especially when the suit is included in the special list for trial.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, I.A 2/25 is dismissed and Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Fr.Sleeba Paul Vattavelil
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S.o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Branch Manager, ING Vysya bank Ltd
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jancy Davis
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s ING Vysya Bank Ltd
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Registrar, Karvy Computer Shares Pvt Ltd.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dileep S Kallar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.T.Jose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Lina Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rakhi Antony
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C.A.Sunil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.G.Titus
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sabitha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Joji Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Request for adjournment of the suit due to the plaintiff's unavailability.
Evidence:
However, this cannot be considered as a genuine ground to postpone the trial.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Dismissal of the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to adduce evidence.
Evidence:
Hence, I.A 2/25 is dismissed and Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Fr.Sleeba Paul Vattavelil vs The Branch Manager, ING Vysya bank Ltd et al regarding dismissal of suit for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Fr.Sleeba Paul Vattavelil vs The Branch Manager, ING Vysya bank Ltd et al regarding dismissal of suit for default.