Case Summary
Plaintiffs Fathima and Supple.2.Shafi filed a suit against defendants seeking injunction. The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff's counsel reported no instructions from the client and the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed as the plaintiff's counsel reported no instructions from the client and the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Fathima
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- W/o. Kuriyante Purakkal Shafi
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Supple.2.Shafi
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o. Khalid
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pathimbeevi
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o. Cheriya Bava
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Moosa
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o. Khalid
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shafi
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o. Khalid
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Fathima et al vs Pathimbeevi et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Fathima et al vs Pathimbeevi et al regarding injunction