Case Summary
Plaintiffs including Fathima Beevi filed suit against defendants including Kunhan Bava seeking way setting and injunction. Case dismissed as plaintiffs did not appear.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Civil Suit - Setting out way and Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for setting out way and injunction was dismissed with costs due to the absence of the plaintiffs.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Name of plaintiff's called. No representation. Suit is dismissed with costs.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Fathima Beevi
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- Wife of Assainar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunhan Bava
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- Son of Assainar
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Not Decided
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit for setting out way and injunction
Evidence:
Name of plaintiff's called. No representation. Suit is dismissed with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Setting out way and Injunction
Category
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Fathima Beevi et al vs Kunhan Bava et al regarding way setting and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Fathima Beevi et al vs Kunhan Bava et al regarding way setting and injunction