Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 168/2021

Case between Faslul Huck vs Raghavan et al regarding mediation agreement

Court
MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-12-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Faslul Huck filed a suit against Raghavan and several other defendants regarding a mediation agreement. The court found the mediation terms lawful and decreed the suit accordingly.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in terms of the mediation agreement as the terms were found to be lawful. The mediation agreement will form part of the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in terms of the mediation agreement as the terms were found to be lawful. The mediation agreement will form part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The mediation agreement was voluntarily signed and found lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The mediation agreement was voluntarily signed and found lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of the mediation agreement found to be lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement. Mediation agreement shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Faslul Huck
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raghavan
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sukumaran
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Radha
Party Age
75
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Baby
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bose
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N.S.Muhammed Usman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.Priya Devi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.S.Benoy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Babu Sebastian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.P.Aravindakshan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.U.Ziyad (no more)
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.T.Paulose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jimmy George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Faslul Huck vs Raghavan et al regarding mediation agreement
Case Code Year
Case between Faslul Huck vs Raghavan et al regarding mediation agreement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won