Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 92 OF 2016

Case between Erachampatt Muhammed Kasim et al vs Jasvanth Kumar regarding rent control petition

Court
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-06-11
Duration
1 year 1 month
Case Closed
Mon, 06/11/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Erachampatt Muhammed Kasim filed a rent control petition against Jasvanth Kumar under the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, but the petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner and power of attorney.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The rent control petition filed by Erachampatt Muhammed Kasim against Jasvanth Kumar was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner and power of attorney.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Petition dismissed
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The rent control petition filed by Erachampatt Muhammed Kasim against Jasvanth Kumar was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner and power of attorney.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Petition filed under section 5(1) of Kerala Building (Lease and rent control) Act. Petitioner absent. Power of Attorney absent. IA 1391/18 dismissed. Hence petition is dismissed in default. (Pronounced by me in open court, this the 11th day of June, 2018) RENT CONTROLLER.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Erachampatt Muhammed Kasim
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o Hamza Haji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jasvanth Kumar
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o Velayudhan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Rent Control petition dismissal
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Petition dismissed due to absence of the petitioner and power of attorney
Evidence:
Petition filed under section 5(1) of Kerala Building (Lease and rent control) Act. Petitioner absent. Power of Attorney absent. IA 1391/18 dismissed. Hence petition is dismissed in default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Erachampatt Muhammed Kasim et al vs Jasvanth Kumar regarding rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Erachampatt Muhammed Kasim et al vs Jasvanth Kumar regarding rent control petition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sat, 06/11/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 06/11/2018 - 12:00
From
Fri, 06/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Sat, 06/30/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Muhammed Faizal.P.T et al vs Sakeer Husain regarding rent control
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Parayil Muhammedkutty vs Kinassery Parambil Sugathan regarding rental agreement settlement
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Partial
Case between Beeran Haji vs Ali regarding rent control petition
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs K.P. Saidalavi regarding rent control petition
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs Vanaja Valliyil regarding Rent Control
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won