Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No . 518/2024

Case between ERA Homes and Projects Private Limited vs Vipindas K.R et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-03-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff is ERA Homes and Projects Private Limited, represented by its Managing Director Elias Joy. The case involves the plaintiff's absence and the consequent dismissal of the suit due to non-representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence without representation despite specific directions to appear in court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence without representation despite specific directions to appear in court.
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was continuously absent and did not provide any representation.
Why Defendant Won:
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was continuously absent and did not provide any representation.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff no representation. Defendant represented. Plaintiff absent despite specific direction to appear. Plaintiff is continuously absent without representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed. All pending I.A’s stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
ERA Homes and Projects Private Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vipindas K.R
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anumol Abraham
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramgopalan
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jeevan Chacko
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G. Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Akhil Alphonse G
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Abraham Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anil Abey Jose
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vishnuja P. M
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bini Elizabeth
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff no representation. Defendant represented. Plaintiff absent despite specific direction to appear. Plaintiff is continuously absent without representation. Suit dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between ERA Homes and Projects Private Limited vs Vipindas K.R et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between ERA Homes and Projects Private Limited vs Vipindas K.R et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won