OS. No. 1024/2023

Case between Elizabath vs Joseph @ Joy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court

COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM

Judge

Smt. Sofia.T.A.

Order Date

2025-12-02

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Elizabath filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against Joseph @ Joy and Bindu. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff absent, no representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Elizabath
Party Age: 63
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Joseph @ Joy
Party Age: 55
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Bindu
Party Age: 48
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Thomas John Morris
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: R. Santhosh Kumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Manoj Joseph Andrews
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Pooja Raveendran
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Reshma Raj. R
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Plaintiff filed for permanent prohibitory injunction.

Evidence:

This suit is filed by the plaintiff for permanent prohibitory injunction u/s 26 order VII and Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification