Case Summary
Ebin Sebastian filed a suit against Ratheesh and Dhanya Ratheesh. The court rejected the plaint due to non-remittance of the balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee. The suit was dismissed based on the statutory period being over.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected due to non-remittance of court fees despite several chances given.
The plaint was rejected due to non-remittance of court fees despite several chances given.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected due to non-remittance of court fees despite several chances given.
The plaint was rejected due to non-remittance of court fees despite several chances given.
Supporting Evidence
Balance court fee not remitted even after given several chances. Statutory period over.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint stands rejected. Pronounced by me in open Court on this the 16th day of January, 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ebin Sebastian
- Party Age
- 29
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ratheesh
- Party Age
- 45
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dhanya Ratheesh
- Relation
- W/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B. Reghukumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manoj S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manjula M.K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Swathy Krishna
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Amalu D. John
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Asmi M.A.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ratheesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint was rejected due to the non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Balance court fee not remitted even after given several chances. Statutory period over. Hence plaint stands rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ebin Sebastian vs Ratheesh et al regarding rejection of plaint due to non-remittance of court fee.
Case Code Year
Case between Ebin Sebastian vs Ratheesh et al regarding rejection of plaint due to non-remittance of court fee.