Case Summary
Dr. Santosh Thomas, the plaintiff, is involved in a case against Suresh Babu V K, the defendant, seeking both mandatory and prohibitory injunction over alleged illegal constructions. The court analyzed the petitions related to additional witnesses and document production.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petitions filed by the plaintiff for document production and additional witness were dismissed by the court.
Key Reasoning:
The court found no merit in the plaintiff's petitions as they were deemed to be attempts to delay proceedings.
The court found no merit in the plaintiff's petitions as they were deemed to be attempts to delay proceedings.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has not taken any steps for production of documents or filed any witness list for the same.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, 1) Petitions are dismissed. 2) Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, parties shall bear their respective costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dr. Santosh Thomas
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suresh Babu V K
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- A T Anilkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Roja A M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Prasanna B T
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Kabil Chandran
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M P Ramnath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P Rajesh Kottakkal
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Varghese Varghese M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Uma R Kammath
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sandhya S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Bepin Paul
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shalu Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought to summon the Assistant Executive Engineer to produce documents related to the construction of Mathew Sons Gateway.
Evidence:
Accordingly I find no merit in the above petition.
Relief Type:
Prohibitory Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The plaintiff claimed that the defendant made illegal constructions in the car parking area.
Evidence:
The plaintiff claims that defendant has made illegal constructions in the plaint B schedule car parking.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Dr. Santosh Thomas vs Suresh Babu V K regarding both mandatory and prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Dr. Santosh Thomas vs Suresh Babu V K regarding both mandatory and prohibitory injunction