Case Summary
The case involves Dharmajan as the plaintiff and Reghukumar and Valsala as defendants. The plaintiff filed the suit for the realization of money but was absent at the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of both the plaintiff and the defendants during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to dismissal.
Plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dharmajan
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Reghukumar
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Valsala
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. G.Udayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. B.L.Prasanth
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Dharmajan vs Reghukumar et al regarding Realisation of Money
Case Code Year
Case between Dharmajan vs Reghukumar et al regarding Realisation of Money