Case Summary
Dhanya G filed a suit against C H Shyna for recovery of money, alleging fraudulent misrepresentations regarding a lease agreement. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant failed to provide a building number necessary for business operations, leading to financial losses.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit, finding that the plaintiff failed to prove her claims regarding expenses and regular payments. The allegations made by the defendant regarding property damages were not rebutted by the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to prove her case due to lack of evidence regarding costs incurred and regular rent payments.
Plaintiff failed to prove her case due to lack of evidence regarding costs incurred and regular rent payments.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff failed to prove her case due to lack of evidence regarding costs incurred and regular rent payments.
Plaintiff failed to prove her case due to lack of evidence regarding costs incurred and regular rent payments.
Supporting Evidence
Therefore from the above discussion, this court is satisfied that plaintiff has failed to prove her case.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, suit is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dhanya G
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- C H Shyna
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
True copy of lawyer notice dated 06.01.2024, Original of the reply lawyer notice dated 02.02.2024
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rajagopalan A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Balagopalan A
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R Rajesh
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Amal A R
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K S Bharathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aadityan S Mannali
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aleena Sony
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover Rs.3,50,000/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
Therefore from the above discussion, this court is satisfied that plaintiff has failed to prove her case.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Legal Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document served as a formal demand for the amount claimed by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Legal Notice Reply
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
This document contains the defendant's response to the plaintiff's legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Photographs
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
These photographs were intended to show the interior works done by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Dhanya G vs C H Shyna regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Dhanya G vs C H Shyna regarding realization of money