Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1205/2022

Case between Dhanesh Babu.B vs P.S. Sajith regarding recovery of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-12-18
Duration
approximately-5 years 19 days
Case Code No.
1205
Case Closed
Thu, 12/18/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Dhanesh Babu.B, the plaintiff, is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendant, P.S. Sajith. The defendant borrowed ₹9,00,000/- from the plaintiff for personal needs but failed to repay the remaining balance.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to repay ₹5,72,500/- along with interest and costs. The suit was decreed based on the evidence presented.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹5,72,500/- together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of filing of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to repay ₹5,72,500/- along with interest and costs. The suit was decreed based on the evidence presented.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the evidence clearly demonstrated the defendant's liability to repay the borrowed amount and failed to provide sufficient evidence to refute the claims.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the evidence clearly demonstrated the defendant's liability to repay the borrowed amount and failed to provide sufficient evidence to refute the claims.
Supporting Evidence
The court observes that the defendant borrowed ₹9,00,000/- from PW1 on 27/11/2020 for the purpose of purchasing a residential property, with an agreement to repay the amount along with interest. It is admitted by PW1 that ₹4,00,000/- was repaid by bank transfer on 17/04/2021.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹5,72,500/- (Rupees Five Lakh Seventy-Two Thousand Five Hundred only) together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of filing of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dhanesh Babu.B
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.S. Sajith
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original promissory note No.4643/2013, Advocate notice, Postal receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Shanavas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Sajikumar P.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Nishin Sha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Haleelulla. S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹5,72,500/- from the defendant and his assets with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹5,72,500/- (Rupees Five Lakh Seventy-Two Thousand Five Hundred only) together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of filing of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of this suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court used this document to establish that the defendant executed a promissory note for the remaining balance of ₹5,00,000/- and was liable to repay the amount with interest.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked to show that the plaintiff demanded repayment of the borrowed amount with interest from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The postal receipt was used to confirm that the advocate notice was dispatched to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 11/27/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 12/18/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Selvaraj. A vs Mony @ Maniyan regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won