Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 262/2022

Case between Dhalapathi Vijay Makkal Iyyakkam et al vs Daniel @ Rahul et al regarding injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-05-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the Plaintiff Dhalapathi Vijay Makkal Iyyakkam represented by A. Ananthu Padickal against the Defendants including Daniel @ Rahul and others. The suit was filed for injunction under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The Plaintiff was absent and there was no representation, while the Defendant was absent but represented. As a result, the suit was dismissed for default.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The Plaintiff was absent and there was no representation, while the Defendant was absent but represented. As a result, the suit was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff absent, no representation. Defendant absent, represented. Plaintiff called absent, suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dhalapathi Vijay Makkal Iyyakkam ( Kollam District Committee, VMI No. 37598) @ (Kollam Nanpans)
Party Age
30
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Daniel @ Rahul
Party Age
31
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Johnson George @ Babu
Party Age
48
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Johnson
Party Age
39
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Film Exhibitors United Organisation of Kerala
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Liya Elsa Alex
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Akhil Raj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G. Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P. Deepa
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
This suit is filed by the Plaintiff for injunction.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Defendant absent, represented. Plaintiff called absent, suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Dhalapathi Vijay Makkal Iyyakkam et al vs Daniel @ Rahul et al regarding injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Dhalapathi Vijay Makkal Iyyakkam et al vs Daniel @ Rahul et al regarding injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won