Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 226/2024

Case between Devadasan Pillai vs Ibrahim regarding security for attachment.

Court
The Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-01-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Ibrahim, and the respondent, Devadasan Pillai, were involved in a case concerning the furnishing of security for an attachment. The court found that sufficient security was provided by the defendant, leading to the lifting of the attachment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition and raised the attachment as sufficient security was furnished by the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition and raised the attachment as sufficient security was furnished by the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
On verification, it is seen that, as per the order in I.A.No.2/2024, the direction was to furnish security from `.2,00,000/- and the plaint claim also is `. 2,00,000/-. Defendant had furnished fixed deposit for `. 2,00,000/- noting lien as security.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition stands allowed and attachment is hereby raised.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Devadasan Pillai
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ibrahim
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Biju K. George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anju O.H.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mathew P. Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ciju I.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition to lift the attachment was allowed since the defendant provided sufficient security.
Evidence:
Hence petition stands allowed and attachment is hereby raised.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Devadasan Pillai vs Ibrahim regarding security for attachment.
Case Code Year
Case between Devadasan Pillai vs Ibrahim regarding security for attachment.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Komalvalliyamma vs Meera et al regarding partition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between P.M.Gopalakrishnan Nair et al vs Adv.P.R.Rajan et al regarding declaration of easement right of way and injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Anie Ittan W/o Ittan et al vs Kurian S/o Joseph regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The Court of the Munsiff Kolenchery
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shibi Baby W/o Baby Joseph vs George S/o Paulose regarding declaration and injunction
THE MUNSIFF AT KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shibi Baby, W/o Baby Joseph et al vs George S/o Paulose regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won