Case Summary
The petitioners Deepak. N and Shobhana filed a petition against the respondent Shari. S under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The case was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioners.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioners failed to appear in court.
The petitioners failed to appear in court.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner absent and no representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Deepak. N
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shobhana
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shari. S
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mundakkal R. Santhosh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shanu Nelson
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anandha Lekshmy V.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vinu Karunakaran
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The petition is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Petitioner absent and no representation. Defect not cured till date. Hence petition is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Deepak. N et al vs Shari. S regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Deepak. N et al vs Shari. S regarding Rent Control