Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RC(OP).No.19/2025

Case between Deepa Mary vs Sajna, Nizam regarding eviction petition under Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Court
THE COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration
approximately-2 years 11 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Deepa Mary, the petitioner and landlord, seeking eviction of Sajna and Nizam, the respondents, for non-payment of rent. The respondents have committed defaults in paying rent and have also altered the petition schedule shop rooms.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has allowed the petition filed by Deepa Mary, ordering the respondents to hand over the vacant possession of the petition schedule building immediately. The respondents have an option to clear the arrears of rent to vacate the eviction.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondents are directed to hand over the vacant possession of petition schedule buildings immediately within 30 days.
Case Type
Eviction Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court has allowed the petition filed by Deepa Mary, ordering the respondents to hand over the vacant possession of the petition schedule building immediately. The respondents have an option to clear the arrears of rent to vacate the eviction.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence provided by the petitioner, including various documents, substantiates her claim for eviction due to non-payment of rent and violation of agreement terms.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Exts. A1 to A8 would prove that the petitioner is entitled to get vacant possession of the petition schedule building under section 11(2)(b), 11(4)(i) and (ii) of the Act.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed as follows:- 1.The respondents are directed to hand over the vacant possession of petition schedule building immediately within 30 days from the date of this order U/s. 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Deepa Mary
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajna
Party Age
44
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nizam
Party Age
60
Plaintiffs Documents
Notarized copy of Sale Deed No. 138/2018, Tax Receipt, Building Certificate Door No. 108, Building Certificate Door No. 109 and 110, Certified copy of Rent Agreement, Postal Receipt, Advocate Notice.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R.Sam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R.Santhosh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manoj Joseph Andrews
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Neeraja Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner sought eviction of the respondents from the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The respondents are directed to hand over the vacant possession of petition schedule building immediately within 30 days from the date of this order.
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Respondents may deposit the arrears to avoid eviction.
Evidence:
The order passed under clause one shall not be executed for a period of one month from today.
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Further directions for eviction under sections 11(4)(i) and (ii).
Evidence:
The respondents are directed to hand over the vacant possession of petition schedule buildings under section 11(4)(i) and (ii) of the Act.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner is to be reimbursed for the costs of the proceedings.
Evidence:
The respondents are also liable to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the ownership of the petitioner over the petition schedule building.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the petitioner's claim regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Building Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the condition and status of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the terms of the lease and the agreed rental amount.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates communication regarding the demand for rent arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Formal demand for the payment of rent arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of the advocate notice by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Ownership Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the petitioner's ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Supports the claims made by the petitioner regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Eviction Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Deepa Mary vs Sajna, Nizam regarding eviction petition under Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Case Code Year
Case between Deepa Mary vs Sajna, Nizam regarding eviction petition under Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Mon, 12/11/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Ruksana vs Najumudeen regarding eviction under Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965.
Court of the Rent Controller
Eviction Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between K.Sreelatha vs Subhash regarding eviction.
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pradeep Naik vs M.Nabeesa Beevi et al regarding eviction.
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER, KOLLAM
Eviction Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Maya T.Pillai vs Jithin Abraham Thomas regarding eviction petition under section 12(3) of the BRC Act.
THE COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Petition Defendant Won
Case between Hamsa vs Jose regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
ADDITIONAL RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Petition Plaintiff Won