Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 109/2025

Case between D.Babu vs Sudheer Babu regarding Declaration and Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-08-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff D.Babu sought a declaration regarding his name and a mandatory injunction to use this name in official documents. However, the case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to implead the concerned authority as directed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff failed to comply with court directions to implead the concerned authority.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff failed to comply with court directions to implead the concerned authority.
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's inaction in impleading necessary parties.
Why Defendant Won:
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's inaction in impleading necessary parties.
Supporting Evidence
It was also observed that a compromise had been filed in terms of the mediation agreement... However, the plaintiff did not take any steps to implead the concerned authority...

Judgment Evidence:

Therefore, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
D.Babu
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudheer Babu
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.Vrajmohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Siju Aravind
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Seeking a declaration that the plaintiff had two names, namely D.Ponnachan@Babu and D.Babu.
Evidence:
The suit was filed for declaring that the plaintiff had two names, namely D.Ponnachan@Babu and D.Babu.
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Seeking a mandatory injunction permitting him to use the name D.Babu alone in all official documents in Kerala.
Evidence:
The plaintiff also sought a mandatory injunction permitting him to use the name D.Babu alone, in all official documents in Kerala.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between D.Babu vs Sudheer Babu regarding Declaration and Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between D.Babu vs Sudheer Babu regarding Declaration and Injunction

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won