Case Summary
The plaintiff, Cyriac Chacko, filed a suit against the defendants Anil Thomas and Marykutty among others. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of proof affidavit and extension petitions.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the lack of required documentation and absence of the parties.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Cyriac Chacko
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anil Thomas
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Marykutty
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Regeena Thomas
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raju Thomas
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Johny K Manippadam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Joby Varghese K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K. Krishnakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to no proof affidavit filed.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Cyriac Chacko vs Anil Thomas et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Cyriac Chacko vs Anil Thomas et al regarding dismissal for default.