Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.O.P 13/2023

Case between C.S.I East Kerala Diocese et al vs Jomi Kuriakose et al regarding eviction of tenants

Court
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER/ MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-07-31
Duration
Case Code No.
13
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a petition filed by the petitioners, landlords including C.S.I. East Kerala Diocese, for the eviction of the respondents, who are tenants including Jomi Kuriakose. The landlords claim the building is in a dilapidated state and require it for institutional purposes, whereas the respondents contest this eviction citing their rights and maintaining that they have been paying the rent.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the Rent Control Petition seeking eviction as the petitioners failed to prove their entitlement under the statutory grounds of eviction.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the Rent Control Petition seeking eviction as the petitioners failed to prove their entitlement under the statutory grounds of eviction.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioners could not establish any legal grounds for eviction as per the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioners could not establish any legal grounds for eviction as per the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Supporting Evidence
It is settled that the Court must reject a claim under Section 11(7) if it is not bonafide. Applying this principle, the present claim does not pass the test of bonafides.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the Rent Control Petition is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C.S.I East Kerala Diocese
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Perumbavoor All Saints C.S.I. Church
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Perumbavoor All Saints C.S.I. Church
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jomi Kuriakose
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anju Paulose
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Unity goups
Relation
Rep. by President Jomy Kuriakose
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Unity goups
Relation
Rep. by Secretory Anju Poulose
Plaintiffs Documents
Land Tax Receipt Thandaper No.1710, Certified copy of plaint in OS 199/2023, Various Letters dated 25/01/2019, 14/01/2022, 02/04/2023, and 31/03/2023.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. T. Geevarghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K. M. Alias
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P. V. Shiji
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Eviction of the respondent tenants from the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
In view of the above findings, none of the statutory grounds under Section 11 are established. The petitioners have thus failed to prove their entitlement to eviction.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified copy of Plaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Presented as evidence in the related case OS 199/2023.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: True copy of the minutes submitted
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Contributes to the understanding of the petitioners' claims.
Reference:
Ext.A3 series
Document Type: Copy of Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of communication between parties regarding the lease.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of communication regarding the lease.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of communication regarding the lease.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Copy of Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of previous communication between parties.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Respondents' assertion regarding securing alternate facilities.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Lawyer copy of notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notification of demand for vacant possession.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of communication related to the notice.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: AD card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of delivery regarding communication.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of communication regarding the petition.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: True copy of written statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of evidence in the ongoing proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: True copy of Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documentation relevant to the lease agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: True copy of Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documentation relevant to the lease agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Certified Copy of Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence related to the lease.
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Copy of Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documentation supporting the petitioners' claims.
Reference:
Ext.A17
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further evidence of compliance or credentials.
Reference:
Ext.A18
Document Type: Reply under Right to Information Act
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Response related to compliance issues of the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.A19
Document Type: Building Certificate
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Assessment of the condition of the building.
Reference:
Ext.X1
Document Type: Report from Perumbavoor Municipality
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Important evidence regarding the compliance of building regulations.
Reference:
Ext.X2

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Eviction
Case Code
R.C.O.P
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Church

Similar Cases

Case between Church Of South India Trust Association vs Smt. Biji Aji regarding recovery of possession of rented property.
Court Of The Rent Controller
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between St. Thomas Evangelical Fellowship of India et al vs Jose Panachikkal Peter regarding payment of rent arrears
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Infant Jesus Church et al vs P. Vijayaraghavan regarding eviction and arrears of rent
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rajesh Radhakrishnan Kartha vs M/s. Cochin Law Chambers et al regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Saramma vs Santhosh C. Kurian regarding eviction.
THE RENT CONTROLLER/MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won