Case Summary
The case involves a complainant and an accused. The complainant has been absent continuously from the hearing since July 30, 2024, leading to the dismissal of the complaint.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint is dismissed due to the continuous absence of the complainant.
Key Reasoning:
The prosecution's case was adversely affected due to the absence of the complainant.
The prosecution's case was adversely affected due to the absence of the complainant.
Why Defendant Won:
The prosecution's case was adversely affected due to the absence of the complainant.
The prosecution's case was adversely affected due to the absence of the complainant.
Supporting Evidence
The prosecution is the case is adversely effected due to the absents of complainant.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the complaint is dismissed U/s 256 Crpc and accused is acquitted.
Parties Involved
Parties
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Complainant vs Accused regarding complaint dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Complainant vs Accused regarding complaint dismissal