Case Summary
The plaintiffs C.N.Vimalan and others filed a suit against the defendants Gopalakumaran Pillai and others. The case was dismissed for default as neither party represented themselves in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of both plaintiffs and defendants.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- C.N.Vimalan
- Party Age
- 77
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Hitha Vimal
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nitha Vimal @ Nitha C.V
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gopalakumaran Pillai
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Geetha Krishnan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raji Radhkrishnan Nair
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to absence of both plaintiff and defendant.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between C.N.Vimalan et al vs Gopalakumaran Pillai et al regarding default dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between C.N.Vimalan et al vs Gopalakumaran Pillai et al regarding default dismissal of suit.