Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1552/2019

Case between C.K. Ullas Krishnan vs C.K. Purushothaman regarding compromise of suit

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-07-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

C.K. Ullas Krishnan filed a suit against C.K. Purushothaman. The case was resolved through a compromise petition filed by both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise filed. The terms of the compromise shall form part of the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee, if any as per law.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise filed. The terms of the compromise shall form part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The compromise petition was found lawful and not against public policy, and was voluntarily signed by both parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The compromise petition was found lawful and not against public policy, and was voluntarily signed by both parties.
Supporting Evidence
Heard both sides in IA 02/2025. Perused the terms of compromise, found lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is decreed in terms of compromise. The terms of compromise shall form part of decree pending IA’s closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C.K. Ullas Krishnan
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C.K. Purushothaman
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saju Thomas N.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joe Pollayil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.T. Jose
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
D.G. Suresh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mathew Varghese
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Radhakrishnan M.K.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N.M. Mohamed Ayub
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.V. Shamsuddhin
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Suit is decreed in terms of compromise. The terms of compromise shall form part of decree pending IA’s closed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between C.K. Ullas Krishnan vs C.K. Purushothaman regarding compromise of suit
Case Code Year
Case between C.K. Ullas Krishnan vs C.K. Purushothaman regarding compromise of suit

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won