Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 4 / 2024

Case between City Wealth Trading Solution vs Baijumon T G et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-08-21
Duration
approximately-4 years 7 months 10 days
Case Closed
Thu, 08/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves City Wealth Trading Solution filing a suit against Baijumon T G and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants have threatened and coerced them for illegal monetary demands, causing fear and harassment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of the plaintiff against the defendants, restraining them from making threats, entering the plaintiff's business premises, and obstructing their business activities.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of the plaintiff against the defendants, restraining them from making threats, entering the plaintiff's business premises, and obstructing their business activities.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established their case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established their case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff emphasizes that any legitimate claims can only be pursued through the due process of law. Further, as per the digital agreement between the parties, disputes are subject to settlement through arbitration. I am satisfied that plaintiff has established his case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed on the following terms. Defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from causing threat or availing the amount from the plaintiff by illegally against the plaintiff including the staff and family members and from illegally entering into the plaint schedule properties and causing obstructions of any kind to the plaintiff or any person claiming under him thereof.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
City Wealth Trading Solution
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Baijumon T G
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shameer M K
Party Age
40
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shihabudheen W
Party Age
41
Plaintiffs Documents
Udyam registration certificate, Rent agreement dated 13.07.2022
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sushanth J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Emmanual Tony
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from forcefully entering into the business premises or the proprietor’s residential property.
Evidence:
Defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from causing threat or availing the amount from the plaintiff by illegally against the plaintiff including the staff and family members and from illegally entering into the plaint schedule properties and causing obstructions of any kind to the plaintiff or any person claiming under him thereof, for peaceful living and conduct of business, unless by due process of law.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Udyam registration certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the true copy of the Udyam registration certificate issued to the plaintiff firm to carry on its business.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the true copy of the rent agreement dated 13.07.2022, entered into between the plaintiff and the landlord.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between City Wealth Trading Solution vs Baijumon T G et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between City Wealth Trading Solution vs Baijumon T G et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Financial liability - dishonoured cheque

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/11/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 08/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won