Case Summary
Petitioner filed a restoration petition for a partition suit, which was allowed by the court on payment of costs to the respondents.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of partition suit
Case Type
Restoration Petition - Partition Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition for the partition suit on payment of costs to the respondents.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Heard. Since it is a suit for partition and since the steps are completed, I am inclined to allow this petition on payment of cost of RS.1000/- each to the contesting R5 and R6. For payment of costs. Cost paid. Petition allowed. Date : 23-10-2017
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Cholakka Pulikkapparambil Pokar
- Relation
- Not mentioned
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Cholakka Pulikkaparambil Pokar @ Kunhimon
- Relation
- Not mentioned
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration of partition suit
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration of the partition suit
Evidence:
Heard. Since it is a suit for partition and since the steps are completed, I am inclined to allow this petition on payment of cost of RS.1000/- each to the contesting R5 and R6. For payment of costs. Cost paid. Petition allowed. Date : 23-10-2017
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition - Partition Suit
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Cholakka Pulikkapparambil Pokar vs Cholakka Pulikkaparambil Pokar @ Kunhimon regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Cholakka Pulikkapparambil Pokar vs Cholakka Pulikkaparambil Pokar @ Kunhimon regarding partition